BMW 3 series 2022 vs Mazda 3 2019

 
BMW 3 series
2022 - 2024
Mazda 3
2019 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel2.5 Petrol
Diesel (BMW 3 series) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda 3) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 286 HP250 HP
Torque: 650 NM434 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.3 secondsn/a seconds
BMW 3 series engine produces 36 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 216 NM more than Mazda 3.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.88.7
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW 3 series consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres48 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1010 km in combined cycle550 km in combined cycle
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 141 mm (5.6 inches)140 mm (5.5 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.66 m
Width: 1.83 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 6 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres374 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 106 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight: 2`265 kg1`950 kg
Net weight:1`710 kg1`533 kg
Load capacity:555 kg417 kg
BMW 3 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Mazda 3. Therefore, BMW 3 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 34 00014 800
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Mazda 3 has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv