BMW 3 series 2024 vs Honda Civic 2024
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Hybrid engines (BMW 3 series) offer better fuel economy and lower emissions than petrol engines, especially in city driving with frequent stops. Petrol (Honda Civic) engines, however, are typically less expensive to buy and maintain, and offer more consistent performance on highways. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW 3 series engine produces 34 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Honda Civic. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 1.1 l/100km + 22.1 kWh/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 8.60 € | 12.60 € | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol€/lElectricity€/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Honda Civic) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 134 mm (5.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.72 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 3 cm longer than the Honda Civic, 3 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 419 litres | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW 3 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`360 kg | 1`750 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`835 kg | 1`305 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 525 kg | 445 kg | |
| BMW 3 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Honda Civic. Therefore, BMW 3 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Honda Civic has
| |