BMW 3 series 2022 vs Renault Megane 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (BMW 3 series) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Renault Megane) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 245 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 144 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 153 HP more power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 256 NM more than Renault Megane. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 39 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Megane) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
| BMW 3 series is 9 cm longer than the Renault Megane, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 389 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1510 litres | 1372 litres | |
|
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 3 series has 111 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`195 kg | 2`131 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`600 kg | 1`528 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 595 kg | 603 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
| |