BMW 3 series 2006 vs Mercedes C class 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 306 HP | 231 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 7.2 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 75 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mercedes C class. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
The Mercedes C class is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
550 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Mercedes C class gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes C class engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X6, BMW Z4 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK, Mercedes SLK | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
BMW 3 series is 6 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 475 litres | |
BMW 3 series has 15 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.84 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.16 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | no data | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Mercedes C class has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW 3 series, so Mercedes C class quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 3800 | 5400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |