BMW 3 series 2005 vs Volvo S60 2004

 
BMW 3 series
2005 - 2007
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 163 HP180 HP
Torque: 340 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 seconds8.8 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 17 HP less power than Volvo S60, but torque is 100 NM more than Volvo S60. Despite less power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.79.2
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity: 61 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 910 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway980 km on highway
830 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.52 m4.58 m
Width: 1.82 m1.80 m
Height: 1.42 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, BMW 3 series has 36 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9652`010
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
BMW 3 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo S60 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably better
Average price (€): 42002800
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv