BMW 3 series 1998 vs Mercedes C class 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 245 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series and Mercedes C class have the same engine power, but BMW 3 series torque is 5 NM more than Mercedes C class. BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 11.1 | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 315 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
920 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on BMW 5 sērija | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes CLK | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.47 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 6 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 440 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |