BMW 3 series 1995 vs Audi 80 1991
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 193 HP | 174 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 19 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Audi 80. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 11.4 l/100km | |
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 3 series consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
590 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 80, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
BMW 3 series has 5 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`815 | 1`810 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 7.5/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Audi 80 has
| |