BMW 3 series 1995 vs Opel Omega 1990

 
BMW 3 series
1995 - 1998
Opel Omega
1990 - 1994
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.8 Petrol2.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 193 HP150 HP
Torque: 280 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.3 seconds9.8 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 43 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.210.4
Real fuel consumption: 9.9 l/100km10.7 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
970 km on highway970 km on highway
650 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.74 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.39 m1.44 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 31 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres520 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data820 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 85 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`780 kg1`955 kg
Net weight:1`395 kg1`415 kg
Load capacity:385 kg540 kg
BMW 3 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 40 procentiem less than Opel Omega. Therefore, Opel Omega is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Opel Omega has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 30003000
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Omega has
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv