BMW 3 series 1993 vs Audi 80 1992

 
BMW 3 series
1993 - 1998
Audi 80
1992 - 1995
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 143 HP150 HP
Torque: 260 NM225 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.9 seconds
BMW 3 series engine produces 7 HP less power than Audi 80, but torque is 35 NM more than Audi 80. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.310.0
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km12.1 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway900 km on highway
780 km with real consumption540 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ground clearance: 130 mm (5.1 inches)135 mm (5.3 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 80, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data710 litres
BMW 3 series has 5 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80.
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8601`810
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Audi 80 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 2600800
Rating in user reviews: 7.2/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Audi 80 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv