BMW 3 series 1991 vs Opel Omega 1989
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 222 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
|
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 14 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.2 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 31 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 870 litres | |
|
Opel Omega has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 85 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`845 kg | 1`895 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`410 kg | 1`375 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 435 kg | 520 kg | |
| BMW 3 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem less than Opel Omega. Therefore, Opel Omega is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Opel Omega has
| |