BMW 3 series 1991 vs Opel Astra 2000

 
BMW 3 series
1991 - 1995
Opel Astra
2000 - 2004
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 192 HP147 HP
Torque: 245 NM203 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 seconds8.8 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 45 HP more power than Opel Astra, whereas torque is 42 NM more than Opel Astra. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.88.4
Real fuel consumption: 10.1 l/100km8.7 l/100km
The Opel Astra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Astra.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle610 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway820 km on highway
640 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Opel Astra) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.
Ground clearance: 130 mm (5.1 inches)130 mm (5.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km370'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years5 years
Engine spread: Used also on BMW 5 sērijaInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Opel Astra might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.11 m
Width: 1.70 m1.71 m
Height: 1.39 m1.42 m
BMW 3 series is 32 cm longer than the Opel Astra, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres370 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1180 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 65 litres more trunk space than the Opel Astra.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.1 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.1 metres less than that of the Opel Astra.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7901`720
Safety:
Quality:
low

above average
Opel Astra has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 495 percent more cases than Opel Astra, so Opel Astra quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 22001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.2/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Opel Astra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv