BMW 3 series 1995 vs Opel Omega 1989

 
BMW 3 series
1995 - 1998
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.5 Petrol2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 170 HP125 HP
Torque: 245 NM195 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9 seconds11.5 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 45 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.09.3
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW 3 series consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway1080 km on highway
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years7 years
Engine spread: Used also on BMW 5 sērijaUsed also on Opel Frontera
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.74 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.39 m1.44 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 31 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres520 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data870 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 85 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`8051`870
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Opel Omega has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Opel Omega, so Opel Omega quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 22003000
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Opel Omega has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv