BMW 3 series 1991 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| BMW 3 series engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 11.2 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 44 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 491 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo 960 has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 56 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |