BMW 3 series 1991 vs Audi 80 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| BMW 3 series engine produces 13 HP more power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 9 NM more than Audi 80. Despite the higher power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 120 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 3 series consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 80, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 425 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | 710 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, BMW 3 series has 10 litres more trunk space than the Audi 80. The Audi 80 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 3 series (by 490 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Audi 80 has
| |