BMW 3 series 1991 vs Jaguar XJ 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 219 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 69 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 125 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 11.2 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 81 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.31 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller, but higher. BMW 3 series is 59 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 10 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 2.1 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`760 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |