BMW 3 series 1996 vs Opel Omega 1989

 
BMW 3 series
1996 - 1998
Opel Omega
1989 - 1994
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.9 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP115 HP
Torque: 180 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds12.5 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 25 HP more power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Opel Omega. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.88.8
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle850 km in combined cycle
730 km with real consumption850 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.74 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.39 m1.44 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 31 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres520 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 85 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.9 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`760no data
Safety: no data
Quality:BMW 3 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Opel Omega has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 22003000
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Opel Omega has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv