BMW 3 series 1996 vs Audi 80 1991

 
BMW 3 series
1996 - 1998
Audi 80
1991 - 1993
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.9 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP137 HP
Torque: 180 NM181 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds11 seconds
BMW 3 series engine produces 3 HP more power than Audi 80, but torque is 1 NM less than Audi 80.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.89.0
BMW 3 series consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 730 km in combined cycle730 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway940 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.43 m4.48 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.39 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 80, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres425 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data710 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`760 kg1`730 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:BMW 3 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Audi 80 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 28001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.2/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Audi 80 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv