BMW 3 series 1993 vs Audi 80 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 168 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Audi 80 is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 22 HP less power than Audi 80, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Audi 80. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 9.0 | |
| BMW 3 series consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi 80, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Audi 80 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Audi 80 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Audi 80 1991 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 5 cm shorter than the Audi 80, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 425 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 710 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.2 metres less than that of the Audi 80, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`735 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`205 kg | 1`270 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 530 kg | 460 kg | |
| BMW 3 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Audi 80. Therefore, BMW 3 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Audi 80 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Audi 80, so Audi 80 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Audi 80 has
| |