BMW 3 series 1986 vs Ford Sierra 1990
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 120 HP | |
Torque: | 226 NM | 171 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 50 HP more power than Ford Sierra, whereas torque is 55 NM more than Ford Sierra. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
The Ford Sierra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Sierra. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
570 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Sierra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
BMW 3 sērija has 4x4: Viscous coupling locking central differential with 37% front / 63% rear torque split. The viscous coupling is integrated into the planetary central differential. It locks the differential in the event of wheel slip and transfers up to 90% of the torque to the axle with traction. The viscous locking rear differential distributes torque between the rear wheels. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.47 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.41 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 15 cm shorter than the Ford Sierra, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
425 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres more than that of the Ford Sierra, which means BMW 3 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`715 | 1`350 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 4400 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Ford Sierra has
| |