BMW 3 series 1987 vs Jaguar XJ 1986

 
BMW 3 series
1987 - 1991
Jaguar XJ
1986 - 1989
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol3.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 113 HP203 HP
Torque: 162 NM302 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds8.4 seconds
Jaguar XJ is a more dynamic driving.
BMW 3 series engine produces 90 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.511.8
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW 3 series consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres89 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 640 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.99 m
Width: 1.64 m1.79 m
Height: 1.38 m1.38 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 67 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 15 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 425 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
425 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10 meters12.4 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 2.4 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`5451`500
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 42005200
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Jaguar XJ has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv