BMW 3 series 1987 vs Jaguar XJ 1986
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 162 NM | 302 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XJ is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 90 HP less power than Jaguar XJ, whereas torque is 140 NM less than Jaguar XJ. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 11.8 | |
|
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 3 series consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XJ, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 89 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XJ gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.38 m | |
|
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 67 cm shorter than the Jaguar XJ, 15 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 425 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
425 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 2.4 metres less than that of the Jaguar XJ, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`545 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Jaguar XJ has
| |
