BMW 3 series 1988 vs Opel Omega 1999

 
BMW 3 series
1988 - 1991
Opel Omega
1999 - 2000
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol2.0 Diesel
Petrol engines (BMW 3 series) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Opel Omega) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 99 HP100 HP
Torque: 141 NM205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14 seconds15 seconds
BMW 3 series engine produces 1 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Opel Omega. Despite less power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.76.6
Real fuel consumption: 9.2 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 315 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 630 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
790 km on highway1470 km on highway
590 km with real consumption930 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 125 mm (4.9 inches)140 mm (5.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Opel Omega can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Opel Omega version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 380'000 km460'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Omega engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 7 years3 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carUsed also on Opel Vectra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.90 m
Width: 1.64 m1.78 m
Height: 1.38 m1.46 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 58 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 14 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres530 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
425 litres830 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 105 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 405 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`565 kg2`090 kg
Net weight:1`085 kg1`540 kg
Load capacity:480 kg550 kg
BMW 3 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem less than Opel Omega. Therefore, Opel Omega is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 58001400
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Omega has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv