BMW 3 series 1983 vs Opel Omega 1999

 
BMW 3 series
1983 - 1987
Opel Omega
1999 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP144 HP
Torque: 140 NM203 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds10.5 seconds
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving.
BMW 3 series engine produces 54 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.89.6
Real fuel consumption: 8.6 l/100km9.6 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
630 km with real consumption780 km with real consumption
Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.32 m4.90 m
Width: 1.64 m1.78 m
Height: 1.38 m1.46 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 58 cm shorter than the Opel Omega, 14 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres530 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
425 litres830 litres
Opel Omega has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 105 litres less trunk space than the Opel Omega. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Omega (by 405 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`490 kg2`080 kg
Net weight:1`050 kg1`535 kg
Load capacity:440 kg545 kg
BMW 3 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem less than Opel Omega. Therefore, Opel Omega is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 58001400
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Opel Omega has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv