BMW 3 series 2015 vs Skoda Octavia 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 252 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 102 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
BMW 3 sērija has 4x4: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes destabilized, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles by an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch in the transfer case. The clutch is partially locked at most times, distributing power to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At higher speeds or when parking, multi-plate clutch is disengaged and all power is transferred to the rear wheels. DSC system (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels separately to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.66 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 3 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 610 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1740 litres | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 115 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 1`937 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Skoda Octavia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW 3 series, so Skoda Octavia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 15 400 | 8000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |