BMW 3 series 2015 vs Mercedes C class 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 252 HP | 156 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 96 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Mercedes C class. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 41 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
1150 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
BMW 3 sērija has 4x4: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes destabilized, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles by an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch in the transfer case. The clutch is partially locked at most times, distributing power to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At higher speeds or when parking, multi-plate clutch is disengaged and all power is transferred to the rear wheels. DSC system (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels separately to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 4 sērija | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Mercedes A klase, Mercedes B klase, Mercedes CLA | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
BMW 3 sērija 2015 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.70 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes C class, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 495 litres | 490 litres | |
BMW 3 series has 5 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 2`075 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | high | |
Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 135 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 18 200 | 16 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |