BMW 3 series 2008 vs Skoda Octavia 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 37 HP more power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Skoda Octavia. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 3 series consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
1450 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
1010 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.57 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.47 m | |
BMW 3 series is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 580 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1385 litres | 1620 litres | |
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 120 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 235 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres more than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means BMW 3 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | 2`010 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | average | |
Skoda Octavia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW 3 series, so Skoda Octavia quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 5800 | 2400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Skoda Octavia has
| |