BMW 3 series 2008 vs Volvo V50 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 300 NM | 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
BMW 3 series engine produces 7 HP more power than Volvo V50, but torque is 40 NM less than Volvo V50. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 5.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
1450 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
960 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
BMW 3 sērija 2008 2.0 engine: The BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100 000 km. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car to replace ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
BMW 3 series is larger, but slightly lower. BMW 3 series is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 417 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1385 litres | no data | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 3 series has 43 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | 1`960 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V50 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 5800 | 3200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 6.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |