BMW 3 series 2005 vs Volvo V70 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 231 HP | 210 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 21 HP more power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Volvo V70. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 10.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
1220 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
850 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
BMW 3 sērija 2005 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering strong performance, the ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.71 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.49 m | |
BMW 3 series is 19 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 5 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 485 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1385 litres | 1641 litres | |
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 25 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V70 (by 256 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.9 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`130 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4200 | 2600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |