BMW 3 series 2006 vs Audi A6 2005
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 122 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10 seconds | |
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 18 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
1320 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
960 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 380'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 4 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on BMW 1 sērija | Used only for this car | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.52 m | 4.93 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 41 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 565 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1385 litres | no data | |
Audi A6 has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 105 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the Audi A6, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`045 | 2`240 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
BMW 3 series has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi A6, so BMW 3 series quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 4200 | 4000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Audi A6 has
| |