BMW 3 series 2003 vs BMW 3 series 2003
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 410 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| BMW 3 series 2003 and BMW 3 series 2003 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. BMW 3 series 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 3 series 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series 2003 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series 2003 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series 2003 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series 2003. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW 3 sērija 2001: 38% front and 62% rear torque distribution via planetary gears. ADB-X (Automatic Differential Brake) electronic traction control system provides differential locking functions. BMW 3 sērija 2001: 38% front and 62% rear torque distribution via planetary gears. ADB-X (Automatic Differential Brake) electronic traction control system provides differential locking functions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 3 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series 2003 is 1 cm longer than the BMW 3 series 2003, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series 2003 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1345 litres | no data | |
| BMW 3 series 2003 has 5 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series 2003. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |