BMW 3 series 2002 vs Volkswagen Passat 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 116 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 175 NM | 210 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Volkswagen Passat is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 34 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Volkswagen Passat. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
960 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
710 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Passat engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A6, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Superb | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Passat might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.68 m | |
Width: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.50 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 20 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 9 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 495 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1345 litres | no data | |
Volkswagen Passat has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 60 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 2`030 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Volkswagen Passat has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen Passat, so Volkswagen Passat quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.9/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |