BMW 3 series 2018 vs Jaguar XE 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XE is a more dynamic driving. BMW 3 series engine produces 30 HP less power than Jaguar XE, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Jaguar XE. Due to the lower power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XE is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XE, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XE. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1330 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1510 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Jaguar XE gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 2 sērija | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar XE might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW 3 sērija 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2018 2.0 engine Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XE 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 4 cm longer than the Jaguar XE, 2 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
480 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.66 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.26 metres less than that of the Jaguar XE. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`085 kg | 2`235 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 3 series is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar XE scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 000 | 13 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Jaguar XE has
| |