BMW 3 series 2018 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016

 
BMW 3 series
2018 -
Alfa Romeo Giulia
2016 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 382 HP510 HP
Torque: 500 NM600 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds3.9 seconds
BMW 3 series engine produces 128 HP less power than Alfa Romeo Giulia, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Alfa Romeo Giulia.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.48.2
The Alfa Romeo Giulia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW 3 series consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Giulia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
750 km on highway1010 km on highway
Alfa Romeo Giulia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

BMW 3 sērija has 4x4: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes destabilized, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles by an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch in the transfer case. The clutch is partially locked at most times, distributing power to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At higher speeds or when parking, multi-plate clutch is disengaged and all power is transferred to the rear wheels. DSC system (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels separately to regain traction and assist in cornering.

Dimensions

Length: 4.71 m4.64 m
Width: 1.83 m1.87 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
BMW 3 series is 7 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo Giulia, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety:
BMW 3 series scores higher in safety tests, but Alfa Romeo Giulia is better rated in child safety tests. The BMW 3 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 34 00029 800
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv