BMW 3 series 2012 vs Mercedes C class 2011
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 245 HP | 184 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 61 HP more power than Mercedes C class, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Mercedes C class. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
1090 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
670 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
BMW 3 sērija has 4x4: BMW xDrive is a proactive all-wheel drive system without a center differential that engages before the vehicle becomes destabilized, unnoticed by the driver. Torque is distributed between the axles by an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch in the transfer case. The clutch is partially locked at most times, distributing power to both axles in a 40/60 front/rear ratio, but the system is capable of sending 100% of the torque to either axle. At higher speeds or when parking, multi-plate clutch is disengaged and all power is transferred to the rear wheels. DSC system (Dynamic Stability Control) also brakes the wheels separately to regain traction and assist in cornering. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 330'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes SLK | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine: Until 2015, engines used to have problems with the timing chain guides, which have been resolved over time. Other problems with this engine are the oil pump performance and its drive chain, as well as cracking ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
BMW 3 series is larger, but slightly lower. BMW 3 series is 3 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 4 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 475 litres | |
BMW 3 series has 5 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class, which means BMW 3 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`075 | 2`020 | |
Safety: | |||
BMW 3 series scores higher in safety tests, but Mercedes C class is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 11 600 | 8000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |