BMW 3 series 2013 vs Volvo V60 2015

 
BMW 3 series
2013 - 2015
Volvo V60
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 218 HP190 HP
Torque: 450 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 seconds7.7 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 28 HP more power than Volvo V60, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Volvo V60. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.14.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.5 l/100km5.5 l/100km
The Volvo V60 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V60.
Fuel tank capacity: 57 litres67 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle1670 km in combined cycle
870 km with real consumption1210 km with real consumption
Volvo V60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Ground clearance: 140 mm (5.5 inches)136 mm (5.4 inches)
BMW 3 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. In addition, the engine has to be removed from the car in order to ...  More about BMW 3 sērija 2013 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.63 m
Width: 1.81 m1.83 m
Height: 1.43 m1.48 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series and Volvo V60 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 495 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1500 litresno data
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 65 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V60.
Turning diameter: 11.3 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 2`090no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Volvo V60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volvo V60, so Volvo V60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10 00013 400
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo V60 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv