BMW 3 series 2010 vs Volvo V50 2007

 
BMW 3 series
2010 - 2010
Volvo V50
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 184 HP136 HP
Torque: 380 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 seconds9.6 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 48 HP more power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volvo V50. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.85.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.1 l/100km6.5 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50.
Fuel tank capacity: 61 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1270 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
1480 km on highway1130 km on highway
1000 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW 3 sērija 2010 2.0 engine: Because of problems with the timing chain, which tends to stretch at 100,000 km, the BMW N47 engine is sometimes called the worst BMW engine. Replacing the timing chain also requires removing the engine from ...  More about BMW 3 sērija 2010 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.52 m
Width: 1.82 m1.77 m
Height: 1.44 m1.46 m
BMW 3 series is larger, but slightly lower.
BMW 3 series is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres417 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1385 litresno data
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 43 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50.
Turning diameter: no data11.1 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`0451`960
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
BMW 3 series has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V50, so BMW 3 series quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 58003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 6.0/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo V50 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv