BMW 3 series 2008 vs Volvo V50 2007

 
BMW 3 series
2008 - 2012
Volvo V50
2007 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 218 HP230 HP
Torque: 270 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 seconds6.9 seconds
BMW 3 series engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo V50.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.38.7
Real fuel consumption: 8.9 l/100km9.8 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
1080 km on highway960 km on highway
700 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW 3 sērija 2008 3.0 engine: Engine is relatively reliable. Most problems relate to the fuel injection system, spark plugs and coils, and the Vanos phase control system. Problems with the high pressure fuel pump were common in early model ...  More about BMW 3 sērija 2008 3.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.53 m4.52 m
Width: 1.82 m1.77 m
Height: 1.44 m1.46 m
BMW 3 series is larger, but slightly lower.
BMW 3 series is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres417 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1385 litresno data
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 43 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V50.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0502`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
BMW 3 series has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V50 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 58003200
Rating in user reviews: 7.3/10 6.0/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo V50 has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv