BMW 3 series 2008 vs Volvo V50 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 218 HP | 230 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
BMW 3 series engine produces 12 HP less power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volvo V50. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 9.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 3 series consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
1030 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
BMW 3 sērija 2008 3.0 engine: Engine is relatively reliable. Most problems relate to the fuel injection system, spark plugs and coils, and the Vanos phase control system. Problems with the high pressure fuel pump were common in early model ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2008 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.53 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.46 m | |
BMW 3 series is larger, but slightly lower. BMW 3 series is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 417 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1385 litres | no data | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 3 series has 43 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`020 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
BMW 3 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V50 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than BMW 3 series, so BMW 3 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 5200 | 3200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 6.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |