BMW 3 series 2007 vs Volvo C70 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 210 NM | 220 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo C70, but torque is 10 NM less than Volvo C70. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 8.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 3 series consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
1210 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
770 km with real consumption | 630 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo C70) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 200 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
350 litres | no data | |
Even though the car is shorter, BMW 3 series has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70. The Volvo C70 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`025 | 2`070 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9800 | 10 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
| |