BMW 3 series 2008 vs Volvo C70 2009

 
BMW 3 series
2008 - 2010
Volvo C70
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 3.0 Diesel2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 245 HP220 HP
Torque: 540 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.4 seconds7.6 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 25 HP more power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 220 NM more than Volvo C70. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.18.9
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW 3 series consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1030 km in combined cycle690 km in combined cycle
1210 km on highway930 km on highway
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo C70) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.62 m
Width: 1.78 m1.84 m
Height: 1.38 m1.40 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 210 litres200 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
350 litresno data
Even though the car is shorter, BMW 3 series has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70. The Volvo C70 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: no data11.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`070
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 980010 000
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv