BMW 3 series 2008 vs Volkswagen EOS 2006

 
BMW 3 series
2008 - 2010
Volkswagen EOS
2006 - 2011
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.2 Petrol
Diesel (BMW 3 series) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volkswagen EOS) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 245 HP250 HP
Torque: 540 NM330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.5 seconds7.3 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 5 HP less power than Volkswagen EOS, but torque is 210 NM more than Volkswagen EOS. Despite less power, BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.49.2
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW 3 series consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen EOS, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle590 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway800 km on highway
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen EOS) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 3 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.
Ground clearance: 143 mm (5.6 inches)106 mm (4.2 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 3 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this BMW 3 series version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.
BMW 3 sērija 2008 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter. The ...  More about BMW 3 sērija 2008 3.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.41 m
Width: 1.78 m1.79 m
Height: 1.38 m1.44 m
BMW 3 series is 17 cm longer than the Volkswagen EOS, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 210 litres205 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
350 litres380 litres
BMW 3 series has 5 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen EOS. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen EOS (by 30 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): no data2`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Volkswagen EOS has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 3 series has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Volkswagen EOS, so Volkswagen EOS quality is probably better
Average price (€): 96005000
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
Volkswagen EOS has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv