BMW 3 series 2008 vs Mercedes CLK 2005

 
BMW 3 series
2008 - 2010
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 245 HP224 HP
Torque: 540 NM510 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.5 seconds7.3 seconds
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive.
BMW 3 series engine produces 21 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.47.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.6 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that by driving the BMW 3 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 3 series consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 980 km in combined cycle790 km in combined cycle
820 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 16 years19 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes S klase
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes CLK might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.65 m
Width: 1.78 m1.74 m
Height: 1.38 m1.42 m
BMW 3 series is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 4 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 210 litres276 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
350 litresno data
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 66 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK.
Turning diameter: no data10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Mercedes CLK has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for BMW 3 series, so Mercedes CLK quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 98007200
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mercedes CLK has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv