BMW 3 series 2018 vs Alfa Romeo Giulia 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 450 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
BMW 3 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 3 series engine produces 40 HP more power than Alfa Romeo Giulia, but torque is 50 NM less than Alfa Romeo Giulia. Thanks to more power BMW 3 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
By specification BMW 3 series consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Giulia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 3 series could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 3 series consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo Giulia. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1380 km in combined cycle | |
970 km on highway | 1650 km on highway | ||
650 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Alfa Romeo Giulia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
BMW 3 sērija 2018 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great resource. Overall, the chains are more reliable than in BMW N-series engines, but also tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine requires good quality fuel, maintenance and ... More about BMW 3 sērija 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.71 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.83 m | 1.87 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
BMW 3 series is 7 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo Giulia, 5 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 1`445 | |
Safety: | |||
BMW 3 series scores higher in safety tests, but Alfa Romeo Giulia is better rated in child safety tests. The BMW 3 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 30 400 | 22 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Alfa Romeo Giulia has
| |