BMW 3 series 2018 vs Mercedes C class 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 1.6 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 - 382 HP | 156 - 510 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 580 NM | 250 - 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 8.4 seconds | 4 - 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 9.4 | 4.0 - 8.2 | |
|
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.71 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
480 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.22 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.78 metres more than that of the Mercedes C class, which means BMW 3 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`159 | ~ 2`089 | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 3 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 3 series scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 31 400 | 26 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |