BMW 3 series 2010 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Chevrolet Malibu can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.4 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 - 306 HP | 167 HP | |
Torque: | 190 - 520 NM | 225 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.7 - 10.3 seconds | 9.5 - 10.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 8.8 | 7.8 - 8.0 | |
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Malibu. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.61 m | 4.87 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.47 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 25 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Malibu, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 545 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
350 litres | no data | |
Chevrolet Malibu has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 335 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`123 | ~ 1`539 | |
Safety: | |||
BMW 3 series scores higher in safety tests. The BMW 3 series scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 13 200 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |