BMW 3 series 2007 vs Volvo C70 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2007 - 2010
Volvo C70
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo C70 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.02.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 156 - 306 HP136 - 230 HP
Torque: 200 - 540 NM220 - 350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.8 - 10.1 seconds7.6 - 11.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.1 - 9.96.1 - 9.8
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C70. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.58 m
Width: 1.78 m1.80 m
Height: 1.38 m1.40 m
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 3 series and Volvo C70 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 210 litres200 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
350 litres404 litres
BMW 3 series has 10 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo C70 (by 54 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters12.7 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`119~ 2`064
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 96005000
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Volvo C70 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv