BMW 3 series 2007 vs Volvo C70 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo C70 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 156 - 306 HP | 136 - 220 HP | |
Torque: | 200 - 540 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 - 10.1 seconds | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 9.9 | 5.9 - 9.6 | |
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C70. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.58 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.40 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 404 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
350 litres | no data | |
Volvo C70 has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 194 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C70. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`119 | ~ 2`108 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 9600 | 9600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |