BMW 3 series 2007 vs Volvo C70 2009

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2007 - 2010
Volvo C70
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW 3 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo C70 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.02.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 156 - 306 HP136 - 220 HP
Torque: 200 - 540 NM220 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.8 - 10.1 seconds7.6 - 11.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.1 - 9.95.9 - 9.6
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C70. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.58 m4.62 m
Width: 1.78 m1.84 m
Height: 1.38 m1.40 m
BMW 3 series is smaller.
BMW 3 series is 4 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 210 litres404 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
350 litresno data
Volvo C70 has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 194 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C70.
Turning diameter: 11 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`119~ 2`108
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average
no data
Average price (€): 980010 000
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo C70 has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv