BMW 3 series 2007 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 | 1.8 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 - 306 HP | 163 - 481 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 540 NM | 240 - 630 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.8 - 10.1 seconds | 4.7 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 - 9.9 | 7.5 - 14.4 | |
|
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK. On average, BMW 3 series equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.42 m | |
| BMW 3 series is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes CLK, 4 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
350 litres | no data | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 180 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`119 | ~ 2`182 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |