BMW 3 series 2003 vs Audi TT 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
BMW 3 series is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 - 3.2 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 - 231 HP | 150 - 250 HP | |
Torque: | 200 - 330 NM | 210 - 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11.3 seconds | 6.4 - 8.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 10.0 | 8.2 - 11.0 | |
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.35 m | |
BMW 3 series is 45 cm longer than the Audi TT, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 220 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
300 litres | no data | |
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 3 series has 40 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`998 | ~ 1`737 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6200 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
Audi TT has
| |