BMW 3 series 2003 vs Audi TT 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2003 - 2007
Audi TT
1999 - 2006
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available only with rear wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel)1.8 - 3.2 (petrol)

Performance

Power: 143 - 231 HP150 - 250 HP
Torque: 200 - 330 NM210 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 11.3 seconds6.4 - 8.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.3 - 10.08.2 - 11.0
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi TT.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.04 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.37 m1.35 m
BMW 3 series is 45 cm longer than the Audi TT, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 3 series is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 260 litres220 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
300 litresno data
BMW 3 series has more luggage capacity.
BMW 3 series has 40 litres more trunk space than the Audi TT.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`998~ 1`737
Safety:
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 58004800
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Audi TT has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • only petrol engines available
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv