BMW 3 series 2000 vs BMW 5 series 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Cabrio | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 143 - 231 HP | 115 - 286 HP | |
Torque: | 200 - 300 NM | 190 - 440 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11 seconds | 6.2 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.0 | 5.9 - 12.2 | |
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.49 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.44 m | |
BMW 3 series is smaller. BMW 3 series is 29 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 3 series is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
300 litres | no data | |
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. BMW 3 series has 160 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 1 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`949 | ~ 2`077 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 6000 | 5200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 3 sērija has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |