BMW 3 series 2000 vs Skoda Octavia 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 3 series
2000 - 2003
Skoda Octavia
2000 - 2004
Body: CabrioHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
BMW 3 series is available only with rear wheel drive, while Skoda Octavia can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol)1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Skoda Octavia is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 143 - 231 HP75 - 180 HP
Torque: 200 - 300 NM126 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 11 seconds7.9 - 15.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.7 - 10.05.0 - 9.0
BMW 3 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Octavia.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.49 m4.51 m
Width: 1.76 m1.73 m
Height: 1.37 m1.43 m
BMW 3 series is 2 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm wider, while the height of BMW 3 series is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 300 litres528 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
300 litres1330 litres
Skoda Octavia has more luggage space.
BMW 3 series has 228 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Octavia. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Octavia (by 1030 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 3 series is 0.8 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia, which means BMW 3 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`949~ 1`831
Safety:
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 52001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 5.3/10
Pros and Cons: BMW 3 sērija has
  • only petrol engines available
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Skoda Octavia has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv